فهد الغفيلي. Ibrahim F Al Ghofaily

Name: فهد الغفيلي
Rating: 9,8 (1909 reviews)

Marx, 1987 Some scientists have said that some innovations that were used at first for military purposes were adapted for a civilian use such as internet can be a positive and a sign of social progress	Fahd Alghofaili References Cowan, R
Recently people have started to argue about its bad and good effect	1969 A Special Supplement: Technology: The Opiate of the Intellectuals

Birmingham: Presessional Programme, EISU, the University of Birmingham.

The Technology Effect
Ibrahim F Al Ghofaily: Technology and Culture, 53 2 : 525-529 Mesthene, E
Ibrahim F Al Ghofaily: Finding a main criterion to measure the technology effect if it is good or bad, such as those were mentioned by Marx 1987 to answer his question, if improved technology means progress or not, focusing on three main issues for measurement, efficiencies, cost, and trouble elimination

Above all, would audiences accept such argument or ignore it? Technology and Culture, 51 1 : 199-215 Dupree, A	Cowan, 2010 This seems to be true, because many innovations were invented at the beginning for military purposes, such as Internet, Radar, GPS, and digital photography, were adapted for civilian uses, such as communication, microwave, navigation, and digital camera
Social Research, 64 3 : 965-988 McDermott, J	Technology the wide concept of knowing and using everything, such as tools and crafts, Woodward, 2013 has been known for a long time

Regardless of the debate about the positive or negative technology effects, some scientists argue that technology use has given mankind superiority over the animal, because it has assisted them to control their environment, and change their way of life continuously.

Ibrahim F Al Ghofaily: However, this complicated argument does not change either party that much, because each side seems to defend his idea blindly as McDermott 1967 says, technology is the opiate of the intellectuals
فهد بن عبد الله الغفيلي: Marx, 1997 This point considerably noticeable and could support effectively the positive thought toward technology
The Technology Effect: New York Review of Books, 31st July 1969 [page not known] McDermott, J

Mesthene, 1967 McDermott has argued that technology should have a positive effect only, but because those who are stood behind its invention are not aware enough of the society, it has the negative face	Mankind has begun to use many different kinds of technology innovation, since the stone use, two million years ago, until the car invention more than hundred years
Cowan 2010 mentioned that her students who are surrounded by technological life will neither eliminate their cars, nor the rest of their technological things for incorrect ideological argument	1987 Does improved technology mean progress? Technology Review, [volume and part number not found]: 33-44 Marx, L

1969 Comment: The Role of Technology in Society and the Need for Historical Perspective.

كتب فهد بن محمد الغفيلي: Marx, 1997 They looked at it in a positive way as a sign of social progress until about the last seventy five years, when few Americans have started to see the new technology in a negative way
فهد بن عبد الله الغفيلي: Technology and Culture, 10 4 : 528-534 Marx, L
Ibrahim F Al Ghofaily: 2013 Academic Skills Guide B1 atom EAP1