Lapidus 2002 , pp 0 | Ideally, one would like to be able to check such accounts against contemporary evidence |
---|---|
Seeing Islam as others saw it: a survey and evaluation of Christian, Jewish, Robert G |
Kafih Jerusalem, 1984 , ch.
9Peter Teed 1992 , p | however, there is no relevant archaeological, epigraphic, or numismatic evidence dating from the time of Muhammad, nor are there any references to him in non-Muslim sources dating from the period before 632 |
---|---|
137 Netanel's work was virtually unknown beyond his native Yemen until modern times, so had little influence on later Jewish thought• |
.
"Muhmmad," Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world• sources are not contemporaneous with the events they purport to relate and sometimes were written many centuries later | See, for example, Bowersock, Glen Warren, Peter Robert Lamont Brown and Oleg Grabar Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World 1999, Harvard University Press p |
---|---|
The Bustan al-Ukul, by Nathanael ibn al-Fayyumi, edited and translated by David Levine, Columbia University Oriental Studies Vol | Denis Gril, Miracles, , Brill, 2007 |
5, "One major challenge to examining initial contacts between Byzantium and the early Muslim umma arises from the controversy surrounding the traditional Islamic account.
6